Ad is loading...
CGMS vs PYLD
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs PYLD
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.14
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Volume$1.55K
Net Assets2.62B
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
Price$26.04
Change+$0.09 (+0.35%)
Volume$3.64K
Net Assets5.08B
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. PYLD commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Buy and PYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYLD has more net assets: 5.08B vs. CGMS (2.62B). PYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: PYLD (1.965) vs CGMS (1.125). CGMS was incepted earlier than PYLD: CGMS (3 years) vs PYLD (2 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than PYLD (0.69). PYLD has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| CGMS | PYLD | CGMS / PYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 1.125 | 1.965 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 5.08B | 52% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.69 | 57% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 398.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 5.90 | 5.94 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | PYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 39% | 9 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and NFE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and NFE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 22% Poorly correlated | +8.54% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.74% |