CGNMF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
857.81M
CLRSF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGNMF vs CLRSF

Header iconCGNMF vs CLRSF Comparison
Open Charts CGNMF vs CLRSFBanner chart's image
CGN MINING
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization857.81M
CASTILE RES
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$43K
Capitalization9.02M
CGNMF vs CLRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGNMF vs. CLRSF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNMF is a Buy and CLRSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CGNMF: $0.30 vs. CLRSF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CGNMF and CLRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGNMF: 21% vs. CLRSF: 132%
Market capitalization -- CGNMF: $857.81M vs. CLRSF: $9.02M
CGNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $857.81M. CLRSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLRSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the long-term than CLRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGNMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLRSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGNMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLRSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the short-term than CLRSF.

Price Growth

CGNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNMF($858M) has a higher market cap than CLRSF($9.02M). CGNMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.243 vs. CLRSF (-27.083). CGNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 623M vs. CLRSF (-2.61M).
CGNMFCLRSFCGNMF / CLRSF
Capitalization858M9.02M9,510%
EBITDA623M-2.61M-23,908%
Gain YTD45.243-27.083-167%
P/E Ratio11.95N/A-
Revenue4.43BN/A-
Total Cash1.27BN/A-
Total Debt2.27BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGNMFCLRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEU737.2817.18
+2.39%
NewMarket Corp
SPAI2.640.06
+2.33%
Safe Pro Group Inc
BUSE24.380.34
+1.41%
First Busey Corp
ISRG544.476.48
+1.20%
Intuitive Surgical
RNAC11.21-0.16
-1.41%
Cartesian Therapeutics

CGNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGNMF and BRIOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGNMF and BRIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGNMF
1D Price
Change %
CGNMF100%
N/A
BRIOF - CGNMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUEMF - CGNMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+18.06%
BNNLF - CGNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
DYLLF - CGNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
HUSIF - CGNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
More

CLRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRSF and FRSPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRSF and FRSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRSF
1D Price
Change %
CLRSF100%
N/A
FRSPF - CLRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
ELMTF - CLRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - CLRSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGNMF - CLRSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNICF - CLRSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More