CGNX vs MLAB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNX is a Hold and MLAB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGNX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGNX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGNX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGNX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MLAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CGNX (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while MLAB (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
CGNX is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
MLAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-1.27% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| CGNX | MLAB | CGNX / MLAB | |
| Capitalization | 7.17B | 592M | 1,212% |
| EBITDA | 145M | 38.9M | 373% |
| Gain YTD | -13.665 | 26.759 | -51% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.23 | 660.35 | 10% |
| Revenue | 838M | 213M | 393% |
| Total Cash | 332M | 28.2M | 1,177% |
| Total Debt | 78.6M | 236M | 33% |
CGNX | MLAB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGNX's Valuation (50) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLAB (94) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CGNX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MLAB (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew similarly to MLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CGNX's SMR Rating (81) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MLAB (98) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew similarly to MLAB’s over the last 12 months.
MLAB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGNX (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MLAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGNX’s over the last 12 months.
CGNX's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLAB (86) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CGNX’s stock grew significantly faster than MLAB’s over the last 12 months.
| CGNX | MLAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCPI | 43.64 | 0.57 | +1.34% |
| Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | |||
| DUHP | 34.06 | 0.44 | +1.31% |
| Dimensional US High Profitability ETF | |||
| RDOG | 37.83 | 0.32 | +0.86% |
| ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | |||
| PAPR | 36.72 | 0.25 | +0.69% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity PowerBffrETF™-Apr | |||
| BLCN | 26.58 | 0.16 | +0.61% |
| Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | |||
CGNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGNX has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGNX jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNX | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| NOVT - CGNX | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| VNT - CGNX | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MKSI - CGNX | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| TRMB - CGNX | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| ST - CGNX | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||
MLAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAB has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAB jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLAB | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| NOVT - MLAB | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| ESE - MLAB | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| FARO - MLAB | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| TRMB - MLAB | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| FTV - MLAB | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
More | ||||