CGUS vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGUS is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CGUS | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 28 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSEEX | 23.94 | -0.37 | -1.52% |
| Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity C | |||
| HWMZX | 55.03 | -1.25 | -2.22% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z | |||
| AGTHX | 76.76 | -1.84 | -2.34% |
| American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A | |||
| GGCCX | 90.00 | -2.24 | -2.43% |
| Gabelli Growth C | |||
| ANODX | 23.25 | -0.73 | -3.04% |
| American Century Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
CGUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGUS has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGUS jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| MSFT - CGUS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| KLAC - CGUS | 68% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| ASML - CGUS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| BLK - CGUS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| AMZN - CGUS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -3.00% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 92% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| VECO - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| ONTO - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
More | ||||