Advertisement
CHDRF vs CHDRY
To understand the difference between Christian Dior SE (CHDRF) vs. Christian Dior SE - ADR (CHDRY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHDRY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CHDRY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHDRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHDRY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHDRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CHDRY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CHDRF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while CHDRY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.14% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
| CHDRF | CHDRY | CHDRF / CHDRY | |
| Capitalization | 100B | 100B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 25.5B | 25.5B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -12.141 | -5.850 | 208% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.23 | 18.46 | 99% |
| Revenue | 82.8B | 82.8B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 12.5B | 12.5B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 49.6B | 49.6B | 100% |
CHDRF | CHDRY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHDRF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRY (17). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRY’s over the last 12 months.
CHDRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (83). This means that CHDRY’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.
CHDRY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (99). This means that CHDRY’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.
CHDRY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (60). This means that CHDRY’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.
CHDRF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRY (63). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRY’s over the last 12 months.
| CHDRF | CHDRY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 59% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
CHDRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHDRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHDRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LVMUY - CHDRF | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| LVMHF - CHDRF | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| HESAY - CHDRF | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| SWGAY - CHDRF | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| PPRUY - CHDRF | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
CHDRY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHDRY and LVMUY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHDRY and LVMUY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHDRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHDRY | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| LVMUY - CHDRY | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.72% | ||
| LVMHF - CHDRY | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| CFRUY - CHDRY | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
| CFRHF - CHDRY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| HESAY - CHDRY | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||