CHEF
Price
$95.54
Change
-$0.38 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.9B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WILC
Price
$33.31
Change
+$1.09 (+3.38%)
Updated
Jul 2, 03:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
463.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHEF vs WILC

CHEF vs WILC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHEF vs. WILC commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHEF is a Buy and WILC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2026
Stock price -- (CHEF: $95.62 vs. WILC: $33.30)
Brand notoriety: CHEF and WILC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHEF: 34% vs. WILC: 33%
Market capitalization -- CHEF: $3.9B vs. WILC: $463.22M
CHEF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $3.9B. WILC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $463.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $7.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWILC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WILC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WILC is a better buy in the long-term than CHEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WILC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WILC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHEF and WILC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHEF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while WILC (@Food Distributors) price change was +4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHEF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+0.62% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEF($3.9B) has a higher market cap than WILC($463M). CHEF has higher P/E ratio than WILC: CHEF (51.25) vs WILC (14.36). CHEF YTD gains are higher at: 53.409 vs. WILC (13.960). CHEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 236M vs. WILC (83.4M). WILC has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. CHEF (123M). WILC has less debt than CHEF: WILC (8.45M) vs CHEF (978M). CHEF has higher revenues than WILC: CHEF (4.26B) vs WILC (623M).
CHEFWILCCHEF / WILC
Capitalization3.9B463M842%
EBITDA236M83.4M283%
Gain YTD53.40913.960383%
P/E Ratio51.2514.36357%
Revenue4.26B623M683%
Total Cash123M274M45%
Total Debt978M8.45M11,568%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHEF vs WILC: Fundamental Ratings
CHEF
WILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1336
SMR RATING
1..100
6160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3137
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
851

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WILC's Valuation (8) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHEF (85). This means that WILC’s stock grew significantly faster than CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as WILC (36). This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to WILC’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's SMR Rating (60) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CHEF (61). This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as WILC (43). This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to WILC’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as WILC (37). This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to WILC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHEFWILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WILC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFIS35.520.32
+0.89%
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
ICLO25.620.04
+0.16%
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
GLIN46.17-0.08
-0.18%
VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF
AIS74.23-5.26
-6.62%
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
PONX3.07-0.46
-13.03%
Tradr 2X Long PONY Daily ETF

CHEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHEF and SYY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHEF and SYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHEF
1D Price
Change %
CHEF100%
+0.27%
SYY - CHEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
AVO - CHEF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
USFD - CHEF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
ANDE - CHEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
WILC - CHEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
More

WILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WILC and PFGC have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILC and PFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WILC
1D Price
Change %
WILC100%
N/A
PFGC - WILC
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
CVGW - WILC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIT - WILC
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
ANDE - WILC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFFG - WILC
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More