CHKKF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CHPGF
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.01 (+1.67%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CHKKF vs CHPGF

Header iconCHKKF vs CHPGF Comparison
Open Charts CHKKF vs CHPGFBanner chart's image
Chakana Copper
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31K
CapitalizationN/A
Chesapeake Gold
Price$0.61
Change+$0.01 (+1.67%)
Volume$94.38K
CapitalizationN/A
CHKKF vs CHPGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKKF vs. CHPGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKKF is a Sell and CHPGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CHKKF: $0.02 vs. CHPGF: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: CHKKF and CHPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKKF: 8% vs. CHPGF: 385%
Market capitalization -- CHKKF: $6.44M vs. CHPGF: $86.4M
CHKKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.44M. CHPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $86.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHPGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CHPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHKKF is a better buy in the long-term than CHPGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHPGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CHPGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHPGF is a better buy in the short-term than CHKKF.

Price Growth

CHKKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while CHPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHPGF($86.4M) has a higher market cap than CHKKF($6.44M). CHKKF YTD gains are higher at: -38.125 vs. CHPGF (-55.770). CHKKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.31M vs. CHPGF (-10.49M). CHPGF has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. CHKKF (2.7M). CHKKF has less debt than CHPGF: CHKKF (186K) vs CHPGF (700K). CHKKF (0) and CHPGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CHKKFCHPGFCHKKF / CHPGF
Capitalization6.44M86.4M7%
EBITDA-4.31M-10.49M41%
Gain YTD-38.125-55.77068%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.7M25.5M11%
Total Debt186K700K27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKKF vs CHPGF: Fundamental Ratings
CHKKF
CHPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6393
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHPGF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (45). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (100). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPGF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (98). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CHKKF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (93). This means that CHKKF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CHKKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (100). This means that CHKKF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKKFCHPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIME0.090.01
+8.64%
Algorhythm Holdings Inc
UNB34.03-0.37
-1.08%
Union Bankshares
EQH46.57-0.75
-1.58%
Equitable Holdings
ESE137.83-2.53
-1.80%
ESCO Technologies
ABUS3.46-0.09
-2.54%
Arbutus Biopharma Corp

CHKKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKKF and KDKGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKKF and KDKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKKF
1D Price
Change %
CHKKF100%
+4.21%
KDKGF - CHKKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.93%
ACRG - CHKKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHPGF - CHKKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.70%
CGDXF - CHKKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDGF - CHKKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CHPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPGF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPGF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPGF
1D Price
Change %
CHPGF100%
-6.70%
GLGDF - CHPGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
IAUX - CHPGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
AU - CHPGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
FNLPF - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
AEM - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More