CHKKF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CNDGF
Price
$0.36
Change
+$0.06 (+19.35%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

CHKKF vs CNDGF

Header iconCHKKF vs CNDGF Comparison
Open Charts CHKKF vs CNDGFBanner chart's image
Chakana Copper
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$64.82K
CapitalizationN/A
Condor Gold
Price$0.36
Change+$0.06 (+19.35%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
CHKKF vs CNDGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKKF vs. CNDGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKKF is a Sell and CNDGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CHKKF: $0.02 vs. CNDGF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: CHKKF and CNDGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKKF: 16% vs. CNDGF: 327%
Market capitalization -- CHKKF: $6.44M vs. CNDGF: $57.22M
CHKKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.44M. CNDGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNDGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNDGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNDGF is a better buy in the long-term than CHKKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNDGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNDGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNDGF is a better buy in the short-term than CHKKF.

Price Growth

CHKKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while CNDGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNDGF($57.2M) has a higher market cap than CHKKF($6.44M). CNDGF YTD gains are higher at: 30.357 vs. CHKKF (-38.125). CNDGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.5M vs. CHKKF (-4.31M). CHKKF has more cash in the bank: 2.7M vs. CNDGF (571K). CHKKF (0) and CNDGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CHKKFCNDGFCHKKF / CNDGF
Capitalization6.44M57.2M11%
EBITDA-4.31M-2.5M172%
Gain YTD-38.12530.357-126%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.7M571K472%
Total Debt186KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKKF vs CNDGF: Fundamental Ratings
CHKKF
CNDGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNDGF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (45). This means that CNDGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (100). This means that CNDGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDGF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (98). This means that CNDGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (63). This means that CNDGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

CNDGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKKF (100). This means that CNDGF’s stock grew similarly to CHKKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKKFCNDGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRINX21.58N/A
N/A
Victory Diversified Stock R
RSMOX24.07N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth A
FGROX29.03N/A
N/A
Emerald Growth Institutional
SASMX36.07-0.40
-1.10%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A
MFELX130.98-26.28
-16.71%
MFS Growth R1

CHKKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKKF and KDKGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKKF and KDKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKKF
1D Price
Change %
CHKKF100%
+4.21%
KDKGF - CHKKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.93%
ACRG - CHKKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHPGF - CHKKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.70%
CGDXF - CHKKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDGF - CHKKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CNDGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNDGF and ZMPLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNDGF and ZMPLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNDGF
1D Price
Change %
CNDGF100%
N/A
ZMPLF - CNDGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNCLF - CNDGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDNRF - CNDGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRMF - CNDGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
CHKKF - CNDGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
More