It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHKP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while CYBR (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.13%.
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CHKP | CYBR | CHKP / CYBR | |
Capitalization | 19.2B | 11.2B | 171% |
EBITDA | 939M | -41.01M | -2,290% |
Gain YTD | 19.989 | -1.558 | -1,283% |
P/E Ratio | 23.14 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.39B | 752M | 318% |
Total Cash | 1.46B | 993M | 147% |
Total Debt | N/A | 581M | - |
CHKP | CYBR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHKP's Valuation (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CYBR (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CYBR (11) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (32) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBR (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CYBR (44) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CYBR (19) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP | CYBR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago59% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHKP has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHKP jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHKP | 100% | -1.75% | ||
CLSK - CHKP | 37% Loosely correlated | -7.61% | ||
RIOT - CHKP | 35% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
PANW - CHKP | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.63% | ||
CYBR - CHKP | 32% Poorly correlated | -5.13% | ||
COIN - CHKP | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.66% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR | 100% | -5.13% | ||
PANW - CYBR | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.63% | ||
COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.66% | ||
DSGX - CYBR | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
CLSK - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -7.61% | ||
CRWD - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
More |