Advertisement
CHKP vs CYBR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKP is a Hold and CYBR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CHKP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CYBR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHKP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CYBR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHKP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.32% price change this week, while CYBR (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CHKP | CYBR | CHKP / CYBR | |
| Capitalization | 19.2B | 11.2B | 171% |
| EBITDA | 939M | -41.01M | -2,290% |
| Gain YTD | 1.007 | 24.268 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.14 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.39B | 752M | 318% |
| Total Cash | 1.46B | 993M | 147% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 581M | - |
CHKP | CYBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHKP's Valuation (69) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CYBR (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CHKP (27) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (32) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBR (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CHKP (64) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CHKP (51) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
| CHKP | CYBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 11 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 83% |
Advertisement
CHKP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHKP has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHKP jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHKP | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| PANW - CHKP | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| DOX - CHKP | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| CYBR - CHKP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| EEFT - CHKP | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| FTNT - CHKP | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||
CYBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBR | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| CRWD - CYBR | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -16.70% | ||
| PANW - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| NOW - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| HUBS - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
More | ||||