CHLLF
Price
$3.53
Change
-$0.13 (-3.55%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
FMHS
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.03 (-37.50%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

CHLLF vs FMHS

Header iconCHLLF vs FMHS Comparison
Open Charts CHLLF vs FMHSBanner chart's image
China Literature
Price$3.53
Change-$0.13 (-3.55%)
Volume$375
CapitalizationN/A
Farmhouse
Price$0.04
Change-$0.03 (-37.50%)
Volume$63.2K
CapitalizationN/A
CHLLF vs FMHS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHLLF vs. FMHS commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and FMHS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (CHLLF: $3.53 vs. FMHS: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CHLLF and FMHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHLLF: 62% vs. FMHS: 309%
Market capitalization -- CHLLF: $4.6B vs. FMHS: $1.04M
CHLLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $4.6B. FMHS’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $1.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $63.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMHS is a better buy in the long-term than CHLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMHS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMHS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHLLF is a better buy in the short-term than FMHS.

Price Growth

CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMHS (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -42.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -4.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (-4.52% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHLLF($4.6B) has a higher market cap than FMHS($1.04M). CHLLF YTD gains are higher at: 7.261 vs. FMHS (-78.571). CHLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. FMHS (-330.02K). CHLLF has more cash in the bank: 7.16B vs. FMHS (8.68K). FMHS has less debt than CHLLF: FMHS (95K) vs CHLLF (843M). CHLLF has higher revenues than FMHS: CHLLF (8.41B) vs FMHS (11.3K).
CHLLFFMHSCHLLF / FMHS
Capitalization4.6B1.04M442,019%
EBITDA1.34B-330.02K-406,947%
Gain YTD7.261-78.571-9%
P/E Ratio48.08N/A-
Revenue8.41B11.3K74,451,327%
Total Cash7.16B8.68K82,449,873%
Total Debt843M95K887,368%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHLLF vs FMHS: Fundamental Ratings
CHLLF
FMHS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9790
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5298
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMHS's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHLLF (55). This means that FMHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

FMHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHLLF (100). This means that FMHS’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FMHS (95). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to FMHS’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMHS (98). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMHS’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMHS (100). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMHS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHLLFFMHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEQUX14.690.12
+0.80%
Putnam Focused International Equity A
PINDX18.650.12
+0.65%
Pioneer Disciplined Growth A
DESUX23.120.13
+0.57%
DWS ESG Core Equity R6
QDVAX12.370.06
+0.49%
EquityCompass Quality Dividend A
HBLFX14.320.01
+0.07%
Hartford Balanced Income F

CHLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHLLF has been closely correlated with NBIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHLLF jumps, then NBIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHLLF
1D Price
Change %
CHLLF100%
N/A
NBIS - CHLLF
73%
Closely correlated
+7.23%
HRYU - CHLLF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UPXI - CHLLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.63%
PODC - CHLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
KRKR - CHLLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-9.80%
More

FMHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMHS and CTTMF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMHS and CTTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMHS
1D Price
Change %
FMHS100%
N/A
CTTMF - FMHS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRPT - FMHS
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHLLF - FMHS
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KKKUF - FMHS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DATI - FMHS
-2%
Poorly correlated
-38.33%
More