CHMG
Price
$47.10
Change
+$0.45 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
201.81M
3 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$33.40
Change
+$0.19 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
Ad is loading...

CHMG vs FRAF

Header iconCHMG vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts CHMG vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Chemung Financial
Price$47.10
Change+$0.45 (+0.96%)
Volume$6.72K
Capitalization201.81M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$33.40
Change+$0.19 (+0.57%)
Volume$14.19K
Capitalization113.45M
CHMG vs FRAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHMG vs. FRAF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHMG is a Hold and FRAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CHMG: $47.10 vs. FRAF: $33.40)
Brand notoriety: CHMG and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHMG: 53% vs. FRAF: 223%
Market capitalization -- CHMG: $201.81M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
CHMG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $201.81M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHMG is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHMG is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

CHMG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.13% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +18.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHMG($202M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FRAF (8.33) and CHMG (7.94) have similar P/E ratio . FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 11.706 vs. CHMG (-3.503). CHMG has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. FRAF (20.1M). CHMG has less debt than FRAF: CHMG (40.8M) vs FRAF (154M). CHMG has higher revenues than FRAF: CHMG (98M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
CHMGFRAFCHMG / FRAF
Capitalization202M113M179%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.50311.706-30%
P/E Ratio7.948.3395%
Revenue98M67.3M146%
Total Cash52.6M20.1M262%
Total Debt40.8M154M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHMG vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
CHMG
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5381
SMR RATING
1..100
3842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2953
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CHMG (39). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (81). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's SMR Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (42). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CHMG (59). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (53). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHMGFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUEVX37.120.36
+0.98%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R6
IVGSX23.430.17
+0.73%
VY® Invesco Growth and Income S
MKVIX13.280.08
+0.61%
MFS International Large Cap Value I
CSVAX18.850.08
+0.43%
Columbia International Div Inc A
MIDSX1.30N/A
N/A
Midas

CHMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHMG has been closely correlated with FRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHMG jumps, then FRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHMG
1D Price
Change %
CHMG100%
+0.96%
FRST - CHMG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
CCBG - CHMG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
BANF - CHMG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
NWBI - CHMG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
CHCO - CHMG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.57%
ORRF - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
FUNC - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
MRBK - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CHMG - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
FCCO - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More