CHMG
Price
$51.10
Change
-$2.53 (-4.72%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
34 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$31.91
Change
-$1.07 (-3.24%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CHMG vs FRAF

Header iconCHMG vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts CHMG vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Chemung Financial
Price$51.10
Change-$2.53 (-4.72%)
Volume$16.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin Financial Services
Price$31.91
Change-$1.07 (-3.24%)
Volume$5.31K
CapitalizationN/A
CHMG vs FRAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHMG vs. FRAF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHMG is a Hold and FRAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CHMG: $51.10 vs. FRAF: $31.91)
Brand notoriety: CHMG and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHMG: 105% vs. FRAF: 106%
Market capitalization -- CHMG: $201.81M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
CHMG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $201.81M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHMG is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than CHMG.

Price Growth

CHMG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.09% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHMG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHMG($202M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FRAF (8.33) and CHMG (7.94) have similar P/E ratio . FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 5.241 vs. CHMG (4.813). CHMG has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. FRAF (20.1M). CHMG has less debt than FRAF: CHMG (40.8M) vs FRAF (154M). CHMG has higher revenues than FRAF: CHMG (98M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
CHMGFRAFCHMG / FRAF
Capitalization202M113M179%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.8135.24192%
P/E Ratio7.948.3395%
Revenue98M67.3M146%
Total Cash52.6M20.1M262%
Total Debt40.8M154M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHMG vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
CHMG
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
806
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4883
SMR RATING
1..100
3842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1854
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CHMG (56). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (83). This means that CHMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's SMR Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (42). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (50). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (54). This means that CHMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHMGFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGYAX26.84-0.32
-1.16%
Vanguard Global Wellesley Income Admiral
CABIX15.08-0.25
-1.63%
AB Global Risk Allocation I
FRURX23.47-0.57
-2.37%
Franklin Utilities R
FALGX49.95-1.31
-2.56%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap M
FEREX10.37-0.29
-2.72%
First Eagle Global Real Assets I

CHMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHMG has been closely correlated with BANF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHMG jumps, then BANF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHMG
1D Price
Change %
CHMG100%
-4.72%
BANF - CHMG
69%
Closely correlated
-5.10%
NWBI - CHMG
69%
Closely correlated
-5.73%
MOFG - CHMG
69%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
CHCO - CHMG
69%
Closely correlated
-5.05%
HTH - CHMG
68%
Closely correlated
-5.22%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-3.24%
ORRF - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
FUNC - FRAF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
CHMG - FRAF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
MRBK - FRAF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.89%
FCCO - FRAF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.90%
More