CHMG
Price
$51.23
Change
-$0.32 (-0.62%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
201.81M
53 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$24.50
Change
-$0.38 (-1.53%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CHMG vs FSFG

Header iconCHMG vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts CHMG vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Chemung Financial
Price$51.23
Change-$0.32 (-0.62%)
Volume$17.95K
Capitalization201.81M
First Savings Financial Group
Price$24.50
Change-$0.38 (-1.53%)
Volume$12.36K
Capitalization115.29M
CHMG vs FSFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHMG vs. FSFG commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHMG is a Hold and FSFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CHMG: $51.23 vs. FSFG: $24.50)
Brand notoriety: CHMG and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHMG: 159% vs. FSFG: 109%
Market capitalization -- CHMG: $201.81M vs. FSFG: $115.29M
CHMG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $201.81M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHMG is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CHMG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHMG($202M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than CHMG: FSFG (18.62) vs CHMG (7.94). CHMG YTD gains are higher at: 4.958 vs. FSFG (-7.756). CHMG has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. FSFG (17.5M). CHMG has less debt than FSFG: CHMG (40.8M) vs FSFG (405M). CHMG has higher revenues than FSFG: CHMG (98M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
CHMGFSFGCHMG / FSFG
Capitalization202M115M176%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.958-7.756-64%
P/E Ratio7.9418.6243%
Revenue98M82.3M119%
Total Cash52.6M17.5M301%
Total Debt40.8M405M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHMG vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
CHMG
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3464
SMR RATING
1..100
3947
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CHMG (48). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (64). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (47). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (53). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (95). This means that CHMG’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYRVX12.09-0.18
-1.47%
Lyrical International Value Equity A
SSGSX45.80-0.83
-1.78%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
OMSYX28.73-0.61
-2.08%
Invesco Main Street All Cap Y
ETLNX14.20-0.31
-2.14%
Eventide Large Cap Focus N
TVIRX78.04-2.38
-2.96%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R4

CHMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHMG has been loosely correlated with HAFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHMG jumps, then HAFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHMG
1D Price
Change %
CHMG100%
-0.62%
HAFC - CHMG
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
FCBC - CHMG
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
ACNB - CHMG
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
CCBG - CHMG
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
FMNB - CHMG
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-1.53%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
TCBI - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
AMAL - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-7.82%
ORRF - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More