CHPGF
Price
$1.13
Change
+$0.01 (+0.89%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
86.4M
FNLPF
Price
$19.37
Change
+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPGF vs FNLPF

Header iconCHPGF vs FNLPF Comparison
Open Charts CHPGF vs FNLPFBanner chart's image
Chesapeake Gold
Price$1.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.89%)
Volume$10.3K
Capitalization86.4M
Fresnillo
Price$19.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Volume$5.66K
Capitalization5.86B
CHPGF vs FNLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHPGF vs. FNLPF commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPGF is a Hold and FNLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CHPGF: $1.13 vs. FNLPF: $19.37)
Brand notoriety: CHPGF and FNLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHPGF: 40% vs. FNLPF: 107%
Market capitalization -- CHPGF: $86.4M vs. FNLPF: $5.86B
CHPGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $86.4M. FNLPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHPGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the long-term than CHPGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CHPGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.16% price change this week, while FNLPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHPGF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLPF($5.86B) has a higher market cap than CHPGF($86.4M). FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 159.034 vs. CHPGF (89.846). FNLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. CHPGF (-10.49M). CHPGF has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. FNLPF (2.56M). CHPGF has less debt than FNLPF: CHPGF (700K) vs FNLPF (1.27B). FNLPF has higher revenues than CHPGF: FNLPF (2.43B) vs CHPGF (0).
CHPGFFNLPFCHPGF / FNLPF
Capitalization86.4M5.86B1%
EBITDA-10.49M829M-1%
Gain YTD89.846159.03456%
P/E RatioN/A25.19-
Revenue02.43B-
Total Cash25.5M2.56M997%
Total Debt700K1.27B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHPGF vs FNLPF: Fundamental Ratings
CHPGF
FNLPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLPF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (29). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPGF (100). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (91). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (36). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHPGF (100). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXHAX26.00N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
TMCIX15.26N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth I
CIQRX12.52N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamll Intl Eq Retl
SEUIX26.86N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Value I (SIMT)
WMGRX23.32-0.14
-0.60%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R

CHPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPGF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPGF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPGF
1D Price
Change %
CHPGF100%
+1.16%
GLGDF - CHPGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
IAUX - CHPGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
AU - CHPGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
FNLPF - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
AEM - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More

FNLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLPF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLPF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLPF
1D Price
Change %
FNLPF100%
+0.46%
PAAS - FNLPF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
HL - FNLPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
AU - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
MAG - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
GLGDF - FNLPF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
More