It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while FNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
CIB is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2024.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CIB | FNB | CIB / FNB | |
Capitalization | 8.27B | 4.97B | 167% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 12.802 | 6.676 | 192% |
P/E Ratio | 5.22 | 10.55 | 49% |
Revenue | 28.51T | 1.57B | 1,814,768% |
Total Cash | N/A | 447M | - |
Total Debt | 32.09T | 3.98B | 805,371% |
CIB | FNB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIB's Valuation (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (53). This means that CIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.
FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIB (100). This means that FNB’s stock grew significantly faster than CIB’s over the last 12 months.
CIB's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (10). This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.
FNB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (48). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
FNB's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (24). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
CIB | FNB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago71% | 9 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 4 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BBJP | 58.52 | 0.41 | +0.71% |
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | |||
GIGB | 47.09 | 0.24 | +0.50% |
Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
EUDG | 33.55 | -0.28 | -0.82% |
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF | |||
XJH | 40.30 | -0.40 | -0.98% |
iShares® ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |||
MSVX | 22.88 | -0.38 | -1.64% |
LHA Market State Alpha Seeker ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIB | 100% | +0.55% | ||
SNV - CIB | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
ITUB - CIB | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
PGC - CIB | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
BSAC - CIB | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
FHN - CIB | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.