FNB
Price
$18.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.6B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$75.38
Change
-$0.28 (-0.37%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.05B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs HWC

FNB vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. HWC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FNB: $18.53 vs. HWC: $75.38)
Brand notoriety: FNB and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 52% vs. HWC: 65%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $6.6B vs. HWC: $6.05B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.6B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than FNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.88% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($6.6B) has a higher market cap than HWC($6.05B). HWC has higher P/E ratio than FNB: HWC (14.78) vs FNB (11.03). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 20.142 vs. FNB (9.951). HWC has more cash in the bank: 556M vs. FNB (452M). HWC has less debt than FNB: HWC (1.68B) vs FNB (3.14B). FNB has higher revenues than HWC: FNB (1.8B) vs HWC (1.44B).
FNBHWCFNB / HWC
Capitalization6.6B6.05B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.95120.14249%
P/E Ratio11.0314.7875%
Revenue1.8B1.44B126%
Total Cash452M556M81%
Total Debt3.14B1.68B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2927
SMR RATING
1..100
2224
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5921
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (50). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (29). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (24). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (51). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (59). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XEM.X0.0005000.000026
+5.59%
NEM cryptocurrency
ERN.X1.000626-0.001870
-0.19%
Ethos Reserve Note cryptocurrency
XVS.X3.113428-0.080815
-2.53%
Venus cryptocurrency
CTK.X0.117087-0.004282
-3.53%
Shentu cryptocurrency
FIL.X0.762266-0.047141
-5.82%
Filecoin cryptocurrency

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.37%
FULT - HWC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
UBSI - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
UCB - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FNB - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
N/A
WTFC - HWC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More