Ad is loading...
CIBCX vs FSBCX
CIBCX vs FSBCX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FSBCX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$72.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.75B
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
Price$19.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.71M
CIBCX vs FSBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FSBCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FSBCX (266M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: CIBCX (2.40) vs FSBCX (1.34). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FSBCX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FSBCX (32 years). FSBCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CIBCX (56.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: CIBCX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. FSBCX (5.60). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.69 vs. FSBCX (15.47).
| CIBCX | FSBCX | CIBCX / FSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.95 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.20 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.706 | 1.223 | 467% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 266M | 41,353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.34 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 5.60 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 16.84 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.69 | 15.47 | 282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.54 | 14.20 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...