Ad is loading...
Compare trend and price CIBCX vs FSRLX
CIBCX vs FSRLX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FSRLX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs FSRLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIBCX vs. FSRLX commentary
Dec 09, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FSRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. FSRLX (53.4M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FSRLX: CIBCX (2.67) vs FSRLX (0.63). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FSRLX: CIBCX (23 years) vs FSRLX (5 years). FSRLX (2.89) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). FSRLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 996.00 vs. CIBCX (27.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSRLX: CIBCX (250) vs FSRLX (100000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.97 vs. FSRLX (0.64).
| CIBCX | FSRLX | CIBCX / FSRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.20 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.89 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.838 | 1.662 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 100B | 53.4M | 187,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.63 | 425% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | 0.64 | 464% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.33 | 8.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...