Ad is loading...
CIBFX vs FCGBX
CIBFX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
Price$72.47
Change-$0.25 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.16B
Templeton Global Balanced C
Price$2.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.27M
CIBFX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. FCGBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a StrongBuy and FCGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FCGBX (300M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: CIBFX (3.22) vs FCGBX (2.95). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBFX (24 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). CIBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. FCGBX (61.11). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBFX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.07 vs. FCGBX (9.06). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.53 vs. FCGBX (2.27).
| CIBFX | FCGBX | CIBFX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.075 | 6.329 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 300M | 36,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.07 | 9.06 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 4.00 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.53 | 2.27 | 1,213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.38 | -0.87 | -4,089% |