Ad is loading...
CIBFX vs FGGBX
CIBFX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
Price$72.62
Change+$0.12 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.59B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.22M
CIBFX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. FGGBX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGGBX (292M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIBFX (3.08) vs FGGBX (2.13). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBFX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.66). CIBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBFX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FGGBX (6.11). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.29 vs. FGGBX (24.20).
| CIBFX | FGGBX | CIBFX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.99 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.949 | 7.143 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 292M | 37,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 2.13 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 6.11 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.28 | 19.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.29 | 24.20 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.39 | 5.44 | 687% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers