Ad is loading...
CIBFX vs FSRLX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
CIBFX vs FSRLX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs FSRLX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs FSRLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIBFX vs. FSRLX commentary
Dec 10, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Hold and FSRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. FSRLX (53.5M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than FSRLX: CIBFX (3.38) vs FSRLX (0.63). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FSRLX: CIBFX (23 years) vs FSRLX (5 years). FSRLX (2.89) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.65). FSRLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 996.00 vs. CIBFX (27.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSRLX: CIBFX (250) vs FSRLX (100000). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. FSRLX (0.64).
| CIBFX | FSRLX | CIBFX / FSRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.89 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.507 | 1.662 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 100B | 53.5M | 186,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 0.63 | 538% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 0.64 | 575% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 8.46 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.49 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers