Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIDVX vs FXAIX
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CIDVX vs FXAIX
Calamos Dividend Growth I
Price$20.71
Change+$0.20 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.84M
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIDVX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIDVX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. CIDVX (21.8M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CIDVX: FXAIX (1.20) vs CIDVX (0.07). CIDVX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CIDVX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CIDVX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CIDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIDVX: FXAIX (0) vs CIDVX (1000000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.92 vs. CIDVX (12.28). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.25 vs. CIDVX (68.02).
| CIDVX | FXAIX | CIDVX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.01 | 7,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.01 | 11,600% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.429 | 7.467 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.20 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 14.92 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.36 | 71.72 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.02 | 116.25 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.06 | 233.53 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement