Ad is loading...
CIDVX vs FXAIX
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CIDVX vs FXAIX
Calamos Dividend Growth I
Price$17.44
Change+$0.32 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.2M
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIDVX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIDVX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. CIDVX (19.2M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CIDVX: FXAIX (1.30) vs CIDVX (0.08). CIDVX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CIDVX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CIDVX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CIDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIDVX: FXAIX (0) vs CIDVX (1000000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. CIDVX (1.32). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 101.19 vs. CIDVX (54.10).
| CIDVX | FXAIX | CIDVX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.01 | 7,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.01 | 11,600% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.366 | -9.758 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.30 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | 5.67 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.70 | 29.58 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.10 | 101.19 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.67 | 173.23 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...