Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIDVX vs FXAIX
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CIDVX vs FXAIX
Calamos Dividend Growth I
Price$19.70
Change+$0.20 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.72M
CIDVX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIDVX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIDVX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. CIDVX (20.7M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CIDVX: FXAIX (1.26) vs CIDVX (0.08). CIDVX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CIDVX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CIDVX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CIDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIDVX: FXAIX (0) vs CIDVX (1000000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. CIDVX (10.39). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. CIDVX (56.52).
| CIDVX | FXAIX | CIDVX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.01 | 7,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.01 | 11,600% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.141 | 1.537 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7M | 634B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.26 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.39 | 12.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.50 | 49.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.52 | 100.49 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.04 | 212.02 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers