CIM
Price
$13.60
Change
-$0.28 (-2.02%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
44 days until earnings call
HP
Price
$18.08
Change
+$0.05 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.16B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIM vs HP

Header iconCIM vs HP Comparison
Open Charts CIM vs HPBanner chart's image
Chimera Investment
Price$13.60
Change-$0.28 (-2.02%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization1.1B
Helmerich & Payne
Price$18.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
Volume$37.37K
Capitalization4.16B
CIM vs HP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIM vs. HP commentary
Jun 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIM is a Hold and HP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CIM: $13.61 vs. HP: $18.09)
Brand notoriety: CIM and HP are both not notable
CIM represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while HP is part of the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIM: 130% vs. HP: 103%
Market capitalization -- CIM: $1.1B vs. HP: $4.16B
CIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.1B. HP’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $4.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $6.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIM is a better buy in the long-term than HP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIM is a better buy in the short-term than HP.

Price Growth

CIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.16% price change this week, while HP (@Contract Drilling) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +4.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

HP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.12% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Contract Drilling (+4.73% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HP($4.16B) has a higher market cap than CIM($1.1B). CIM has higher P/E ratio than HP: CIM (19.74) vs HP (10.08). CIM YTD gains are higher at: 2.024 vs. HP (-42.212). HP has less debt than CIM: HP (545M) vs CIM (10.1B). HP has higher revenues than CIM: HP (2.83B) vs CIM (205M).
CIMHPCIM / HP
Capitalization1.1B4.16B26%
EBITDAN/A986M-
Gain YTD2.024-42.212-5%
P/E Ratio19.7410.08196%
Revenue205M2.83B7%
Total CashN/A298M-
Total Debt10.1B545M1,853%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIM vs HP: Fundamental Ratings
CIM
HP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9889
SMR RATING
1..100
1777
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4888
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4669
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIM's Valuation (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HP (59) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that CIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HP’s over the last 12 months.

HP's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as CIM (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to CIM’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's SMR Rating (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HP (77) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that CIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HP’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HP (88) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that CIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HP’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as HP (69) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that CIM’s stock grew similarly to HP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIMHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMUAX13.65N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value A
TRTIX20.71N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq I
PNBAX27.38N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Large-Cap Value A
DDICX14.89N/A
N/A
Macquarie Wealth Builder C
TETIX13.87N/A
N/A
RBC Enterprise I

CIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIM has been closely correlated with MFA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIM jumps, then MFA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIM
1D Price
Change %
CIM100%
-0.86%
MFA - CIM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
STWD - CIM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
RWT - CIM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
NLY - CIM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
PMT - CIM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
More