CIM
Price
$13.88
Change
-$0.18 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
31 days until earnings call
TWO
Price
$10.77
Change
+$0.15 (+1.41%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.37B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIM vs TWO

Header iconCIM vs TWO Comparison
Open Charts CIM vs TWOBanner chart's image
Chimera Investment
Price$13.88
Change-$0.18 (-1.28%)
Volume$8.93K
Capitalization1.1B
Two Harbors Investment
Price$10.77
Change+$0.15 (+1.41%)
Volume$26.37K
Capitalization1.37B
CIM vs TWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIM vs. TWO commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIM is a Buy and TWO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CIM: $14.06 vs. TWO: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: CIM and TWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIM: 137% vs. TWO: 207%
Market capitalization -- CIM: $1.1B vs. TWO: $1.37B
CIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.1B. TWO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIM is a better buy in the long-term than TWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWO is a better buy in the short-term than CIM.

Price Growth

CIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while TWO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

TWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.11% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TWO($1.37B) has a higher market cap than CIM($1.1B). TWO has higher P/E ratio than CIM: TWO (666.67) vs CIM (19.74). CIM YTD gains are higher at: 3.348 vs. TWO (-3.348). TWO has less debt than CIM: TWO (1.89B) vs CIM (10.1B). CIM has higher revenues than TWO: CIM (205M) vs TWO (31.8M).
CIMTWOCIM / TWO
Capitalization1.1B1.37B80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.348-3.348-100%
P/E Ratio19.74666.673%
Revenue205M31.8M645%
Total CashN/A1.25M-
Total Debt10.1B1.89B534%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIM vs TWO: Fundamental Ratings
CIM
TWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
1796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4877
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TWO's Valuation (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CIM (15). This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to CIM’s over the last 12 months.

TWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CIM (100). This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to CIM’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's SMR Rating (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWO (96). This means that CIM’s stock grew significantly faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TWO (77). This means that CIM’s stock grew similarly to TWO’s over the last 12 months.

CIM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TWO (68). This means that CIM’s stock grew similarly to TWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIMTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINFX21.640.09
+0.42%
Lord Abbett International Opp F
JORFX20.070.08
+0.40%
Janus Henderson Global Select I
RGBFX39.570.13
+0.33%
American Funds Global Balanced R5
NBHCX14.540.01
+0.07%
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
PAGRX119.43-0.69
-0.57%
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth I

TWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWO has been closely correlated with NLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TWO jumps, then NLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWO
1D Price
Change %
TWO100%
-0.75%
NLY - TWO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
ARR - TWO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
IVR - TWO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
DX - TWO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
AGNC - TWO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More