CIO
Price
$5.82
Change
+$0.07 (+1.22%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
13 days until earnings call
SFSHF
Price
$12.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

CIO vs SFSHF

Header iconCIO vs SFSHF Comparison
Open Charts CIO vs SFSHFBanner chart's image
City Office Reit
Price$5.82
Change+$0.07 (+1.22%)
Volume$262.93K
CapitalizationN/A
Safestore Holdings
Price$12.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$334
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CIO vs SFSHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CIO vs. SFSHF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIO is a Sell and SFSHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CIO: $5.82 vs. SFSHF: $11.47)
Brand notoriety: CIO and SFSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIO: 150% vs. SFSHF: 143%
Market capitalization -- CIO: $209.2M vs. SFSHF: $2.48B
CIO [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $209.2M. SFSHF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIO is a better buy in the long-term than SFSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CIO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.19% price change this week, while SFSHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.34% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFSHF($2.48B) has a higher market cap than CIO($209M). CIO has higher P/E ratio than SFSHF: CIO (23.53) vs SFSHF (6.60). CIO YTD gains are higher at: 2.617 vs. SFSHF (2.129). SFSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337M vs. CIO (92.8M). CIO has more cash in the bank: 30.1M vs. SFSHF (18.1M). CIO has less debt than SFSHF: CIO (670M) vs SFSHF (795M). SFSHF has higher revenues than CIO: SFSHF (222M) vs CIO (179M).
CIOSFSHFCIO / SFSHF
Capitalization209M2.48B8%
EBITDA92.8M337M28%
Gain YTD2.6172.129123%
P/E Ratio23.536.60356%
Revenue179M222M81%
Total Cash30.1M18.1M166%
Total Debt670M795M84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIO vs SFSHF: Fundamental Ratings
CIO
SFSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
9074
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
180
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIO's Valuation (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFSHF (61) in the null industry. This means that CIO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CIO (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to CIO’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CIO (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to CIO’s over the last 12 months.

SFSHF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CIO (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to CIO’s over the last 12 months.

CIO's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFSHF (80) in the null industry. This means that CIO’s stock grew significantly faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SFSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and CIO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and CIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSHF
1D Price
Change %
SFSHF100%
N/A
CIO - SFSHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
LSGOF - SFSHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - SFSHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - SFSHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHH - SFSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More