Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CIPMX (1.17B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CIPMX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CIPMX (0.00). CIPMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CIPMX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CIPMX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CIPMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPMX: FSMAX (0) vs CIPMX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.22 vs. CIPMX (-14.99). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. CIPMX (-29.95).
| CIPMX | FSMAX | CIPMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.883 | 14.423 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 43.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.99 | 21.22 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.78 | 59.43 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.95 | 34.83 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.81 | 134.18 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers