Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISGX vs GFAFX
CISGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CISGX vs GFAFX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr Instl
Price$20.49
Change+$0.25 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.99
Change+$0.66 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.89B
CISGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISGX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. CISGX (2.46B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CISGX: GFAFX (0.32) vs CISGX (0.00). CISGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CISGX (5 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CISGX (0.84) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISGX: GFAFX (250) vs CISGX (500000). CISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.18 vs. GFAFX (10.62). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. CISGX (-24.64).
| CISGX | GFAFX | CISGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.67 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.67 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.023 | 9.802 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 317B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.18 | 10.62 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.07 | 56.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.64 | 54.59 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.09 | 83.65 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement