It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CISS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CISS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSHP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CISS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -17.50% price change this week, while HSHP (@Marine Shipping) price change was -8.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.85%.
HSHP is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.
The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
CISS | HSHP | CISS / HSHP | |
Capitalization | 2.45M | 247M | 1% |
EBITDA | 11.5M | 86.5M | 13% |
Gain YTD | -59.530 | 10.597 | -562% |
P/E Ratio | 0.01 | 11.56 | 0% |
Revenue | 45.2M | 112M | 40% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 43.8K | 720M | 0% |
CISS | HSHP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 5 days ago54% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago77% | 10 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 4 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CISS and DAC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISS and DAC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CISS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CISS | 100% | +15.48% | ||
DAC - CISS | 20% Poorly correlated | -7.53% | ||
AMKBF - CISS | 11% Poorly correlated | -6.77% | ||
CICOF - CISS | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HSHP - CISS | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.42% | ||
HAFN - CISS | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.59% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSHP has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSHP jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP | 100% | -3.42% | ||
GNK - HSHP | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
SBLK - HSHP | 55% Loosely correlated | -9.20% | ||
SB - HSHP | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.15% | ||
GOGL - HSHP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
ECO - HSHP | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
More |