CITE vs FORLU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITE is a Sell and FORLU is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CITE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFORLU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CITE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FORLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CITE (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while FORLU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CITE is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CITE | FORLU | CITE / FORLU | |
| Capitalization | 111M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | -1.8M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.141 | 4.550 | 135% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.35 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 21.3K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 100K | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RYWCX | 47.52 | 0.86 | +1.84% |
| Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth C | |||
| SFSLX | 29.80 | 0.30 | +1.02% |
| 1919 Financial Services C | |||
| PCAPX | 86.38 | 0.59 | +0.69% |
| Principal Capital Appreciation R4 | |||
| CLRYX | 21.01 | 0.05 | +0.24% |
| Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst3 | |||
| GDSRX | 29.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R | |||
CITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITE has been loosely correlated with CITEU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITE jumps, then CITEU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CITE | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| CITEU - CITE | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ABL - CITE | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ONYX - CITE | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HYAC - CITE | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| FORLU - CITE | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FORLU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FORLU and CITE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORLU and CITE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORLU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORLU | 100% | N/A | ||
| CITE - FORLU | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| EVGRU - FORLU | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THCPU - FORLU | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLRC - FORLU | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WEL - FORLU | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||