CKISY
Price
$34.65
Change
+$2.86 (+9.00%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
50 days until earnings call
CPXWF
Price
$35.29
Change
-$7.29 (-17.12%)
Updated
Jan 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
Ad is loading...

CKISY vs CPXWF

Header iconCKISY vs CPXWF Comparison
Open Charts CKISY vs CPXWFBanner chart's image
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$34.65
Change+$2.86 (+9.00%)
Volume$537
Capitalization13.33B
Capital Power
Price$35.29
Change-$7.29 (-17.12%)
Volume$148.05K
Capitalization3.68B
CKISY vs CPXWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKISY vs. CPXWF commentary
Jan 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKISY is a Hold and CPXWF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CKISY: $34.65 vs. CPXWF: $35.29)
Brand notoriety: CKISY and CPXWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKISY: 50% vs. CPXWF: 234%
Market capitalization -- CKISY: $13.33B vs. CPXWF: $3.68B
CKISY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $13.33B. CPXWF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKISY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCPXWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CKISY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than CKISY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPXWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CPXWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CKISY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +7.31% price change this week, while CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -16.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CKISY is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-1.35% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKISY($13.3B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). CPXWF has higher P/E ratio than CKISY: CPXWF (18.45) vs CKISY (12.33). CKISY YTD gains are higher at: 7.309 vs. CPXWF (-20.803). CKISY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.28B vs. CPXWF (1.06B). CKISY has higher revenues than CPXWF: CKISY (6.62B) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CKISYCPXWFCKISY / CPXWF
Capitalization13.3B3.68B362%
EBITDA9.28B1.06B873%
Gain YTD7.309-20.803-35%
P/E Ratio12.3318.4567%
Revenue6.62B3.57B186%
Total CashN/A245M-
Total DebtN/A3.62B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKISY vs CPXWF: Fundamental Ratings
CKISY
CPXWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
961
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4149
SMR RATING
1..100
9756
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISY (52). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXWF (49). This means that CKISY’s stock grew similarly to CPXWF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISY (97). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISY (44). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISY (41). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKISYCPXWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIADX24.450.16
+0.66%
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA
MTOIX20.98-0.06
-0.29%
NYLI Income Builder Class I
MCTOX12.22-0.06
-0.49%
Modern Capital Tactical Income A
RNWGX78.43-1.31
-1.64%
American Funds New World R6
EQIIX11.67-0.24
-2.02%
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Advtg Inst

CKISY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISY and AGLNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISY and AGLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISY
1D Price
Change %
CKISY100%
N/A
AGLNF - CKISY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHF - CKISY
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
CDUAF - CKISY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CPXWF - CKISY
8%
Poorly correlated
-17.12%
AGLXY - CKISY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with TAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then TAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
-17.12%
TAC - CPXWF
47%
Loosely correlated
-20.56%
ACLLF - CPXWF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
BIP - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
NWE - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
FTS - CPXWF
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More