CLBR vs MTAL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBR is a StrongBuy and MTAL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLBR (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +6.48% price change this week, while MTAL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +11.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLBR is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
MTAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+11.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CLBR | MTAL | CLBR / MTAL | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 902M | 24% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -1.68M | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.128 | -10.075 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 200.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 35.1K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.46M | - |
| CLBR | MTAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 22% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 10% | 6 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 38% |
CLBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLBR and SOC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLBR and SOC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLBR | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOC - CLBR | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| TBMC - CLBR | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| FRHC - CLBR | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| DMYY - CLBR | 23% Poorly correlated | +8.80% | ||
| MTAL - CLBR | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||
MTAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAL has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAL jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTAL | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| TECK - MTAL | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| FCX - MTAL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| HBM - MTAL | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SCCO - MTAL | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| BHP - MTAL | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
More | ||||