CLBR vs RFAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBR is a Buy and RFAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRFAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RFAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CLBR (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while RFAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
RFAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.78% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CLBR | RFAC | CLBR / RFAC | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 77.6M | 281% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -2.2M | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.638 | 4.753 | -560% |
| P/E Ratio | 200.00 | 540.50 | 37% |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 4.07K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 793K | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SVIFX | 10.97 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity C | |||
| GSMQX | 19.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Svc | |||
| CUHAX | 10.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory US 500 Enh Vol Wtd Idx A | |||
| WLGCX | 23.74 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund C | |||
| WIISX | 12.90 | -0.07 | -0.54% |
| William Blair International Sm Cap Gr R6 | |||
CLBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLBR has been closely correlated with GLLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLBR jumps, then GLLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLBR | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| GLLI - CLBR | 83% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FIAC - CLBR | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.38% | ||
| GHIX - CLBR | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TETEU - CLBR | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RFAC - CLBR | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
RFAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFAC has been loosely correlated with WTMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFAC jumps, then WTMA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFAC | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| WTMA - RFAC | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLMI - RFAC | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBR - RFAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| JWSM - RFAC | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TGAA - RFAC | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||