Ad is loading...
CLDHF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
GWWTF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLDHF vs GWWTF

Header iconCLDHF vs GWWTF Comparison
Open Charts CLDHF vs GWWTFBanner chart's image
Retail China Tr
Price$0.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Growthpoint Properties
Price$0.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CLDHF vs GWWTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLDHF vs. GWWTF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDHF is a Hold and GWWTF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLDHF: $0.58 vs. GWWTF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: CLDHF and GWWTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDHF: 100% vs. GWWTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLDHF: $1.32B vs. GWWTF: $1.76B
CLDHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.32B. GWWTF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGWWTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GWWTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWWTF is a better buy in the long-term than CLDHF.

Price Growth

CLDHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GWWTF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.01% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWWTF($1.76B) has a higher market cap than CLDHF($1.32B). CLDHF has higher P/E ratio than GWWTF: CLDHF (18.62) vs GWWTF (8.09). CLDHF YTD gains are higher at: -0.051 vs. GWWTF (-3.375). GWWTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.45B vs. CLDHF (304M). GWWTF has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. CLDHF (253M). CLDHF has less debt than GWWTF: CLDHF (1.97B) vs GWWTF (70.3B). GWWTF has higher revenues than CLDHF: GWWTF (13.7B) vs CLDHF (368M).
CLDHFGWWTFCLDHF / GWWTF
Capitalization1.32B1.76B75%
EBITDA304M6.45B5%
Gain YTD-0.051-3.3752%
P/E Ratio18.628.09230%
Revenue368M13.7B3%
Total Cash253M3.36B8%
Total Debt1.97B70.3B3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVIIX19.73-0.07
-0.35%
Praxis Value Index I
ESAGX10.61-0.07
-0.66%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
TNVAX18.31-0.18
-0.96%
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value A
FOSFX63.95-0.81
-1.25%
Fidelity Overseas
PGOFX51.89-0.92
-1.74%
Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth A

CLDHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDHF has been closely correlated with IVREF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDHF jumps, then IVREF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDHF
1D Price
Change %
CLDHF100%
N/A
IVREF - CLDHF
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
KPDCF - CLDHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVPR - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWWTF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARLLF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GWWTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWWTF and PPRQF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWWTF and PPRQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWWTF
1D Price
Change %
GWWTF100%
N/A
PPRQF - GWWTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMBF - GWWTF
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.81%
CCPPF - GWWTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLCP - GWWTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
AOMR - GWWTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More