Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLDL vs QLD
CLDL vs QLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLDL vs. QLD commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDL is a Buy and QLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 7.73B vs. CLDL (5.84M). CLDL has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: CLDL (-3.280) vs QLD (-5.260). CLDL was incepted earlier than QLD: CLDL (4 years) vs QLD (19 years). QLD (0.95) and CLDL (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . QLD has a higher turnover CLDL (20.00) vs CLDL (20.00).
| CLDL | QLD | CLDL / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | -3.280 | -5.260 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 5.84M | 7.73B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.95 | 101% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 24.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.28 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLDL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDL has been closely correlated with DOCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDL jumps, then DOCN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDL | 100% | -3.68% | ||
| DOCN - CLDL | 70% Closely correlated | -4.77% | ||
| ZS - CLDL | 68% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| NOW - CLDL | 67% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| ADSK - CLDL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| JAMF - CLDL | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -2.78% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| SNPS - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||