Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLDL vs SPXL
CLDL vs SPXL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLDL vs. SPXL commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDL is a Hold and SPXL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 4.85B vs. CLDL (5.96M). CLDL has a higher annual dividend yield than SPXL: CLDL (-0.309) vs SPXL (-6.896). CLDL was incepted earlier than SPXL: CLDL (4 years) vs SPXL (17 years). SPXL (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than CLDL (0.96). SPXL has a higher turnover CLDL (20.00) vs CLDL (20.00).
| CLDL | SPXL | CLDL / SPXL | |
| Gain YTD | -0.309 | -6.896 | 4% |
| Net Assets | 5.96M | 4.85B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.87 | 110% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 29.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.88 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLDL | SPXL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDL has been closely correlated with DOCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDL jumps, then DOCN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDL | 100% | -2.86% | ||
| DOCN - CLDL | 71% Closely correlated | -5.04% | ||
| ZS - CLDL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| NOW - CLDL | 67% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| JAMF - CLDL | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| ADSK - CLDL | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
SPXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPXL | 100% | -3.38% | ||
| MSFT - SPXL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AAPL - SPXL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| AMZN - SPXL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| META - SPXL | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| NVDA - SPXL | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
More | ||||