CLDT
Price
$8.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
54 days until earnings call
SQFT
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLDT vs SQFT

Header iconCLDT vs SQFT Comparison
Open Charts CLDT vs SQFTBanner chart's image
Chatham Lodging Trust
Price$8.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$177.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Presidio Property Trust
Price$0.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.46K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLDT vs SQFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SQFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CLDT vs. SQFT commentary
Sep 08, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDT is a StrongBuy and SQFT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2024
Stock price -- (CLDT: $8.14 vs. SQFT: $0.66)
Brand notoriety: CLDT and SQFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDT: 64% vs. SQFT: 64%
Market capitalization -- CLDT: $489.04M vs. SQFT: $16.89M
CLDT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $489.04M. SQFT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $16.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSQFT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SQFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SQFT is a better buy in the long-term than CLDT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLDT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLDT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SQFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQFT is a better buy in the short-term than CLDT.

Price Growth

CLDT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while SQFT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLDT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

SQFT is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.23% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLDT($489M) has a higher market cap than SQFT($16.9M). CLDT has higher P/E ratio than SQFT: CLDT (333.33) vs SQFT (0.83). CLDT YTD gains are higher at: -22.869 vs. SQFT (-36.087). CLDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.7M vs. SQFT (33.1M). CLDT has more cash in the bank: 68.1M vs. SQFT (7.78M). SQFT has less debt than CLDT: SQFT (103M) vs CLDT (505M). CLDT has higher revenues than SQFT: CLDT (311M) vs SQFT (17.6M).
CLDTSQFTCLDT / SQFT
Capitalization489M16.9M2,893%
EBITDA86.7M33.1M262%
Gain YTD-22.869-36.08763%
P/E Ratio333.330.8340,395%
Revenue311M17.6M1,767%
Total Cash68.1M7.78M875%
Total Debt505M103M490%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLDT: Fundamental Ratings
CLDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLDTSQFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SQFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMSLX17.380.02
+0.12%
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
TASZX21.61N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Small Cap Value Z
KTCIX44.51-0.10
-0.22%
DWS Science and Technology Inst
DRDAX25.88-0.07
-0.27%
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
BGRUX105.49-0.62
-0.58%
Baron Growth R6

SQFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQFT and DBRG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQFT and DBRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQFT
1D Price
Change %
SQFT100%
-3.52%
DBRG - SQFT
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
GOOD - SQFT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
PK - SQFT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
PEB - SQFT
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
CLDT - SQFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More