Ad is loading...
CLDT
Price
$8.86
Change
-$0.14 (-1.56%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
106 days until earnings call
STRW
Price
$11.07
Change
-$0.11 (-0.98%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
108 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLDT vs STRW

Header iconCLDT vs STRW Comparison
Open Charts CLDT vs STRWBanner chart's image
Chatham Lodging Trust
Price$8.86
Change-$0.14 (-1.56%)
Volume$242.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Strawberry Fields REIT
Price$11.07
Change-$0.11 (-0.98%)
Volume$9.36K
CapitalizationN/A
CLDT vs STRW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
STRW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLDT vs. STRW commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDT is a Sell and STRW is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLDT: $8.86 vs. STRW: $11.07)
Brand notoriety: CLDT and STRW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDT: 58% vs. STRW: 48%
Market capitalization -- CLDT: $489.04M vs. STRW: $51.47M
CLDT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $489.04M. STRW’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $51.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STRW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STRW is a better buy in the long-term than CLDT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STRW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STRW is a better buy in the short-term than CLDT.

Price Growth

CLDT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while STRW (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLDT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

STRW is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.85% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLDT($489M) has a higher market cap than STRW($51.5M). CLDT has higher P/E ratio than STRW: CLDT (333.33) vs STRW (20.38). STRW YTD gains are higher at: 49.060 vs. CLDT (-15.360). CLDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.7M vs. STRW (75.2M). CLDT has more cash in the bank: 68.1M vs. STRW (12.2M). CLDT has less debt than STRW: CLDT (505M) vs STRW (538M). CLDT has higher revenues than STRW: CLDT (311M) vs STRW (99.8M).
CLDTSTRWCLDT / STRW
Capitalization489M51.5M950%
EBITDA86.7M75.2M115%
Gain YTD-15.36049.060-31%
P/E Ratio333.3320.381,635%
Revenue311M99.8M312%
Total Cash68.1M12.2M558%
Total Debt505M538M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLDT: Fundamental Ratings
CLDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLDTSTRW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
STRW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YFSNX15.230.05
+0.33%
AMG Yacktman Global N
MRJAX10.91-0.02
-0.18%
Morgan Stanley Multi-Asset Real Return A
PGSYX20.00-0.12
-0.60%
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Y
CRLVX10.05-0.10
-0.99%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invstmnts Intl Eq Inv
ATHAX23.21-0.28
-1.19%
American Century Heritage A

CLDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDT has been closely correlated with RLJ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDT jumps, then RLJ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDT
1D Price
Change %
CLDT100%
-1.56%
RLJ - CLDT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
PEB - CLDT
75%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
DRH - CLDT
74%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
INN - CLDT
72%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
APLE - CLDT
72%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
More

STRW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRW has been loosely correlated with NRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STRW jumps, then NRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRW
1D Price
Change %
STRW100%
-0.98%
NRWRF - STRW
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PKST - STRW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
SHO - STRW
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
MITT - STRW
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CLDT - STRW
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
More