CLFD
Price
$42.53
Change
-$0.62 (-1.44%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
453.55M
13 days until earnings call
CMBM
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.02 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
120.35M
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLFD vs CMBM

Header iconCLFD vs CMBM Comparison
Open Charts CLFD vs CMBMBanner chart's image
Clearfield
Price$42.53
Change-$0.62 (-1.44%)
Volume$87.28K
Capitalization453.55M
Cambium Networks
Price$0.44
Change+$0.02 (+4.76%)
Volume$362.29K
Capitalization120.35M
CLFD vs CMBM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. CMBM commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a StrongBuy and CMBM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CLFD: $42.53 vs. CMBM: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: CLFD and CMBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 60% vs. CMBM: 15%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $453.55M vs. CMBM: $120.35M
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $453.55M. CMBM’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $120.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the long-term than CMBM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMBM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMBM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMBM is a better buy in the short-term than CLFD.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.28% price change this week, while CMBM (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

CMBM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+0.78% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($454M) has a higher market cap than CMBM($120M). CLFD has higher P/E ratio than CMBM: CLFD (37.60) vs CMBM (6.51). CLFD YTD gains are higher at: 37.194 vs. CMBM (-31.638). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.6M vs. CMBM (-52.1M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. CMBM (18.7M). CLFD has less debt than CMBM: CLFD (19.5M) vs CMBM (31.7M). CMBM (220M) and CLFD (217M) have equivalent revenues.
CLFDCMBMCLFD / CMBM
Capitalization454M120M378%
EBITDA24.6M-52.1M-47%
Gain YTD37.194-31.638-118%
P/E Ratio37.606.51578%
Revenue217M220M99%
Total Cash163M18.7M872%
Total Debt19.5M31.7M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs CMBM: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
CMBM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBM's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CLFD (66) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CMBM (100) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (90) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CMBM (98) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CMBM (62) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMBM (100) in the null industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew significantly faster than CMBM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDCMBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSTO0.01N/A
N/A
Blue Star Opportunities Corp.
BYLTF0.22N/A
N/A
Baylin Technologies Inc.
GRVWF0.28N/A
N/A
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Company Ltd.
FRTAY18.03N/A
N/A
Freenet AG
NPNYY7.02-0.14
-1.95%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-1.44%
ZBRA - CLFD
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
EXTR - CLFD
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
DGII - CLFD
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
BDC - CLFD
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
HPE - CLFD
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
More

CMBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMBM and SYNX have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMBM and SYNX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBM
1D Price
Change %
CMBM100%
+3.77%
SYNX - CMBM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
AIRG - CMBM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
AIOT - CMBM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
ADTN - CMBM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
CMTL - CMBM
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More