CLFD
Price
$33.26
Change
-$10.88 (-24.65%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
453.55M
90 days until earnings call
COMM
Price
$14.99
Change
+$0.55 (+3.81%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
283.87M
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLFD vs COMM

Header iconCLFD vs COMM Comparison
Open Charts CLFD vs COMMBanner chart's image
Clearfield
Price$33.26
Change-$10.88 (-24.65%)
Volume$885.89K
Capitalization453.55M
CommScope Holding
Price$14.99
Change+$0.55 (+3.81%)
Volume$11.81M
Capitalization283.87M
CLFD vs COMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. COMM commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Buy and COMM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CLFD: $33.28 vs. COMM: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: CLFD: Not notable vs. COMM: Notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 618% vs. COMM: 165%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $453.55M vs. COMM: $283.87M
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $453.55M. COMM’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $283.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOMM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COMM is a better buy in the long-term than CLFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COMM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COMM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than COMM.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -24.04% price change this week, while COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +82.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

COMM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+3.23% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($454M) has a higher market cap than COMM($284M). COMM YTD gains are higher at: 187.908 vs. CLFD (7.355). COMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 519M vs. CLFD (24.6M). COMM has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. CLFD (163M). CLFD has less debt than COMM: CLFD (19.5M) vs COMM (9.32B). COMM has higher revenues than CLFD: COMM (5.79B) vs CLFD (217M).
CLFDCOMMCLFD / COMM
Capitalization454M284M160%
EBITDA24.6M519M5%
Gain YTD7.355187.9084%
P/E Ratio37.60N/A-
Revenue217M5.79B4%
Total Cash163M544M30%
Total Debt19.5M9.32B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs COMM: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
COMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6224
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8372
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COMM's Valuation (91) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (96) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (83) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (43) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDCOMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKRRF0.19N/A
N/A
Philly Shipyard ASA
HCMLF80.62N/A
N/A
HOLCIM LTD
GZPZY38.00N/A
N/A
Gaztransport & Tecnigaz
MSHXF42.85N/A
N/A
Mitsubishi Shokuhin Co Ltd.
TAOIF0.07N/A
-0.79%
TAG Oil Ltd.

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-24.60%
EXTR - CLFD
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
ZBRA - CLFD
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
DGII - CLFD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
HPE - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
LITE - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

COMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMM has been loosely correlated with CLFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMM jumps, then CLFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMM
1D Price
Change %
COMM100%
+3.88%
CLFD - COMM
48%
Loosely correlated
-24.60%
CIEN - COMM
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
EXTR - COMM
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
ZBRA - COMM
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
DGII - COMM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More