It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLFD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -15.45% price change this week, while ERIC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.92%.
CLFD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
ERIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
CLFD | ERIC | CLFD / ERIC | |
Capitalization | 454M | 18B | 3% |
EBITDA | 24.6M | -8.9B | -0% |
Gain YTD | 5.399 | 32.363 | 17% |
P/E Ratio | 37.60 | 13.57 | 277% |
Revenue | 217M | 263B | 0% |
Total Cash | 163M | 50.3B | 0% |
Total Debt | 19.5M | 54.3B | 0% |
CLFD | ERIC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ERIC's Valuation (9) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (66) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ERIC (94) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's SMR Rating (88) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ERIC (88) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (60) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ERIC (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD | ERIC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago52% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago80% | about 1 month ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLFD | 100% | -7.18% | ||
ZBRA - CLFD | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
UI - CLFD | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.44% | ||
BDC - CLFD | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
DGII - CLFD | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
KN - CLFD | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More |