Advertisement
CLFD vs HLIT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Hold and HLIT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLIT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HLIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLIT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HLIT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while HLIT (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +6.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +75.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLFD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
HLIT is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.30% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| CLFD | HLIT | CLFD / HLIT | |
| Capitalization | 545M | 1.64B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 11.4M | 37.5M | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 37.633 | 52.376 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 174.43 | 188.38 | 93% |
| Revenue | 149M | 397M | 38% |
| Total Cash | 91.1M | 109M | 84% |
| Total Debt | 10.9M | 131M | 8% |
CLFD | HLIT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLFD's Valuation (71) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HLIT (77) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to HLIT’s over the last 12 months.
HLIT's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (97) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HLIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's SMR Rating (93) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HLIT (95) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to HLIT’s over the last 12 months.
HLIT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (45) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HLIT’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
HLIT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HLIT’s stock grew significantly faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
| CLFD | HLIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MQQQ | 249.56 | 13.92 | +5.91% |
| Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF | |||
| BNOV | 47.97 | 0.57 | +1.20% |
| Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF Nov | |||
| FLOW | 38.59 | -0.21 | -0.54% |
| Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF | |||
| BKGI | 45.61 | -0.27 | -0.59% |
| BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF | |||
| PBOG | 31.14 | -1.14 | -3.54% |
| Port Bldng BlckIntgrtdlGsExplrtnPrddxETF | |||
CLFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| KN - CLFD | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| ITRN - CLFD | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| HLIT - CLFD | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| TSAT - CLFD | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| VSAT - CLFD | 37% Loosely correlated | -6.09% | ||
More | ||||
HLIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLIT has been loosely correlated with DGII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLIT jumps, then DGII could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLIT | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| DGII - HLIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ADTN - HLIT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CRNT - HLIT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| VIAV - HLIT | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| EXTR - HLIT | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
More | ||||