CLFD
Price
$43.36
Change
-$0.58 (-1.32%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
453.55M
15 days until earnings call
PI
Price
$117.18
Change
+$4.59 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLFD vs PI

Header iconCLFD vs PI Comparison
Open Charts CLFD vs PIBanner chart's image
Clearfield
Price$43.36
Change-$0.58 (-1.32%)
Volume$710
Capitalization453.55M
Impinj
Price$117.18
Change+$4.59 (+4.08%)
Volume$610.79K
Capitalization3.4B
CLFD vs PI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. PI commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a StrongBuy and PI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CLFD: $43.38 vs. PI: $117.18)
Brand notoriety: CLFD and PI are both not notable
CLFD represents the Telecommunications Equipment, while PI is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 51% vs. PI: 138%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $453.55M vs. PI: $3.4B
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $453.55M. PI’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $59.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the long-term than PI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than PI.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while PI (@Semiconductors) price change was +4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.88% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

@Semiconductors (+4.30% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PI($3.4B) has a higher market cap than CLFD($454M). PI has higher P/E ratio than CLFD: PI (53.45) vs CLFD (37.60). CLFD YTD gains are higher at: 39.935 vs. PI (-19.331). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.6M vs. PI (15.4M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. PI (148M). CLFD has less debt than PI: CLFD (19.5M) vs PI (292M). PI has higher revenues than CLFD: PI (364M) vs CLFD (217M).
CLFDPICLFD / PI
Capitalization454M3.4B13%
EBITDA24.6M15.4M160%
Gain YTD39.935-19.331-207%
P/E Ratio37.6053.4570%
Revenue217M364M60%
Total Cash163M148M110%
Total Debt19.5M292M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs PI: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
PI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2416
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7561
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLFD's Valuation (66) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PI (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to PI’s over the last 12 months.

PI's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (75) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PI’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

PI's SMR Rating (90) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (90) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PI’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PI (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to PI’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for PI (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew significantly faster than PI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDPI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILESX17.99N/A
N/A
FI Instl Grp US Lrg Cp Eq Env & Scl Val
LMPFX109.69N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Growth FI
MOORX17.00N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R4
TIISX12.89N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq R6
PXGOX17.75N/A
N/A
Impax Global Opportunities Institutional

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-1.27%
ZBRA - CLFD
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
EXTR - CLFD
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
DGII - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
BDC - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
HPE - CLFD
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More