CLFD
Price
$38.37
Change
+$0.51 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
453.55M
12 days until earnings call
UTSI
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.25M
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLFD vs UTSI

Header iconCLFD vs UTSI Comparison
Open Charts CLFD vs UTSIBanner chart's image
Clearfield
Price$38.37
Change+$0.51 (+1.35%)
Volume$68.63K
Capitalization453.55M
UTStarcom Holdings
Price$2.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$208
Capitalization24.25M
CLFD vs UTSI Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLFD vs. UTSI commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Hold and UTSI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CLFD: $38.37 vs. UTSI: $2.74)
Brand notoriety: CLFD and UTSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLFD: 58% vs. UTSI: 3%
Market capitalization -- CLFD: $453.55M vs. UTSI: $24.25M
CLFD [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $453.55M. UTSI’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $24.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLFD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UTSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the long-term than UTSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLFD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTSI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLFD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UTSI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than UTSI.

Price Growth

CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +11.25% price change this week, while UTSI (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

UTSI is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-1.17% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($454M) has a higher market cap than UTSI($24.2M). CLFD YTD gains are higher at: 23.774 vs. UTSI (-5.517). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.6M vs. UTSI (-3.99M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. UTSI (49M). UTSI has less debt than CLFD: UTSI (2.49M) vs CLFD (19.5M). CLFD has higher revenues than UTSI: CLFD (217M) vs UTSI (13.1M).
CLFDUTSICLFD / UTSI
Capitalization454M24.2M1,876%
EBITDA24.6M-3.99M-617%
Gain YTD23.774-5.517-431%
P/E Ratio37.60N/A-
Revenue217M13.1M1,656%
Total Cash163M49M333%
Total Debt19.5M2.49M783%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLFD vs UTSI: Fundamental Ratings
CLFD
UTSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
202
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTSI's Valuation (30) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (67) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that UTSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as UTSI (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to UTSI’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as UTSI (92) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to UTSI’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as UTSI (52) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to UTSI’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTSI (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew significantly faster than UTSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFDUTSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGACX9.810.06
+0.62%
Calvert Global Energy Solutions C
UIVPX12.240.07
+0.58%
MFS Intrinsic Value R3
HQICX20.390.09
+0.44%
Hartford Equity Income C
LVOPX18.700.04
+0.21%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities P
GSLAX16.30N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
+1.35%
ZBRA - CLFD
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
KN - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
BDC - CLFD
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
DGII - CLFD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
CIEN - CLFD
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
More

UTSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UTSI and LTRX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UTSI and LTRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTSI
1D Price
Change %
UTSI100%
N/A
LTRX - UTSI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
AUDC - UTSI
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
BKTI - UTSI
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.78%
ZBRA - UTSI
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
CLFD - UTSI
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More