CLGCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
PPTA
Price
$11.67
Change
-$0.79 (-6.34%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLGCF vs PPTA

Header iconCLGCF vs PPTA Comparison
Open Charts CLGCF vs PPTABanner chart's image
Clarity Metals
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$52.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Perpetua Resources
Price$11.67
Change-$0.79 (-6.34%)
Volume$20.54K
CapitalizationN/A
CLGCF vs PPTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLGCF vs. PPTA commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGCF is a Hold and PPTA is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CLGCF: $0.02 vs. PPTA: $11.67)
Brand notoriety: CLGCF and PPTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLGCF: 201% vs. PPTA: 166%
Market capitalization -- CLGCF: $2.47M vs. PPTA: $283.79M
CLGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.47M. PPTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $283.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePPTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PPTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PPTA is a better buy in the long-term than CLGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLGCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPTA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PPTA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PPTA is a better buy in the short-term than CLGCF.

Price Growth

CLGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while PPTA (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

PPTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPTA($284M) has a higher market cap than CLGCF($2.47M). PPTA YTD gains are higher at: 268.139 vs. CLGCF (-39.714). CLGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.63M vs. PPTA (-14.14M). PPTA has more cash in the bank: 3.23M vs. CLGCF (184K). CLGCF has less debt than PPTA: CLGCF (0) vs PPTA (27.9K). CLGCF (0) and PPTA (0) have equivalent revenues.
CLGCFPPTACLGCF / PPTA
Capitalization2.47M284M1%
EBITDA-3.63M-14.14M26%
Gain YTD-39.714268.139-15%
P/E RatioN/A16.08-
Revenue00-
Total Cash184K3.23M6%
Total Debt027.9K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PPTA: Fundamental Ratings
PPTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLGCFPPTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYPIX82.230.40
+0.49%
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv
GSBDX16.25N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth A
UGTIX28.52N/A
N/A
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy Ins
AIIYX22.04-0.05
-0.23%
Invesco EQV International Equity Y
HDGYX35.34-0.11
-0.31%
Hartford Dividend and Growth Y

CLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLGCF and XXMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLGCF and XXMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLGCF
1D Price
Change %
CLGCF100%
-2.68%
XXMMF - CLGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTCO - CLGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
ODV - CLGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
PPTA - CLGCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
TIHRF - CLGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PPTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPTA has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PPTA jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPTA
1D Price
Change %
PPTA100%
-6.34%
HL - PPTA
49%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
MUX - PPTA
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
PAAS - PPTA
45%
Loosely correlated
-6.14%
TORXF - PPTA
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
ARMN - PPTA
43%
Loosely correlated
-6.33%
More