Ad is loading...
CLLXF
Price
$0.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
ERO
Price
$15.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
111 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLLXF vs ERO

Header iconCLLXF vs ERO Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs EROBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.62K
CapitalizationN/A
Ero Copper
Price$15.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$295.46K
CapitalizationN/A
CLLXF vs ERO Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. ERO commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and ERO is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.67 vs. ERO: $15.61)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and ERO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 190% vs. ERO: 130%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. ERO: $1.98B
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. ERO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ERO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERO is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ERO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.44% price change this week, while ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERO is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.49% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERO($1.98B) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than ERO: CLLXF (1111.11) vs ERO (19.67). ERO YTD gains are higher at: 0.633 vs. CLLXF (-48.578). ERO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 208M vs. CLLXF (337K). ERO has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. CLLXF (6.71M). CLLXF has less debt than ERO: CLLXF (74.7K) vs ERO (446M). ERO has higher revenues than CLLXF: ERO (427M) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFEROCLLXF / ERO
Capitalization35.1M1.98B2%
EBITDA337K208M0%
Gain YTD-48.5780.633-7,671%
P/E Ratio1111.1119.675,648%
Revenue0427M-
Total Cash6.71M112M6%
Total Debt74.7K446M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs ERO: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
ERO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6952
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9276
SMR RATING
1..100
8987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
273
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERO's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (98). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (92). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (89). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (83). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (27). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCSGX16.680.31
+1.89%
Franklin Small Cap Growth C
PCBIX48.190.62
+1.30%
Principal MidCap Institutional
BSGLX33.660.25
+0.75%
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr I
BINIX27.110.14
+0.52%
Baron International Growth Institutional
IMACX9.570.02
+0.21%
Delaware Ivy Multi-Asset Income C

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+3.00%
GSM - CLLXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
TECK - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
SOUHY - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
ERO - CLLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
SCCO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
More

ERO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERO
1D Price
Change %
ERO100%
-0.25%
HBM - ERO
74%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
SCCO - ERO
73%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
FCX - ERO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
LUNMF - ERO
71%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CSCCF - ERO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
More