Ad is loading...
CLMOF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
CWPWF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLMOF vs CWPWF

Header iconCLMOF vs CWPWF Comparison
Open Charts CLMOF vs CWPWFBanner chart's image
Cliemon AB
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Concord New Energy Group
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CLMOF vs CWPWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLMOF vs. CWPWF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMOF is a Hold and CWPWF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLMOF: $0.10 vs. CWPWF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CLMOF and CWPWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLMOF: 100% vs. CWPWF: 30%
Market capitalization -- CLMOF: $20.23M vs. CWPWF: $696.39M
CLMOF [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $20.23M. CWPWF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $696.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLMOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWPWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLMOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CWPWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWPWF is a better buy in the long-term than CLMOF.

Price Growth

CLMOF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CWPWF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (-0.08% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWPWF($696M) has a higher market cap than CLMOF($20.2M). CWPWF YTD gains are higher at: -7.640 vs. CLMOF (-80.916). CWPWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. CLMOF (-39.16M). CWPWF has more cash in the bank: 3.53B vs. CLMOF (222M). CLMOF has less debt than CWPWF: CLMOF (103M) vs CWPWF (12.6B). CWPWF has higher revenues than CLMOF: CWPWF (2.55B) vs CLMOF (8.39M).
CLMOFCWPWFCLMOF / CWPWF
Capitalization20.2M696M3%
EBITDA-39.16M1.49B-3%
Gain YTD-80.916-7.6401,059%
P/E RatioN/A5.17-
Revenue8.39M2.55B0%
Total Cash222M3.53B6%
Total Debt103M12.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLMOF vs CWPWF: Fundamental Ratings
CLMOF
CWPWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
9563
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7672
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10083
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWPWF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLMOF (80). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.

CWPWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMOF (100). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.

CWPWF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMOF (95). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew similarly to CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.

CWPWF's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMOF (76). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew similarly to CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.

CWPWF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMOF (100). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew similarly to CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCAR17.240.64
+3.83%
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
RPAR19.22-0.08
-0.40%
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
JUNW29.84-0.12
-0.41%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Jun ETF
ACWV111.89-0.65
-0.58%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
FYT57.59-0.37
-0.63%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF

CLMOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMOF and ADN have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMOF and ADN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLMOF
1D Price
Change %
CLMOF100%
N/A
ADN - CLMOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-16.51%
CGKEF - CLMOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLXF - CLMOF
0%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
CLPXF - CLMOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.62%
CWPWF - CLMOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CWPWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWPWF and CWEN have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWPWF and CWEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWPWF
1D Price
Change %
CWPWF100%
N/A
CWEN - CWPWF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
BRLXF - CWPWF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
BEPC - CWPWF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
CGKEF - CWPWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLMOF - CWPWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More