CLMT
Price
$13.14
Change
+$0.41 (+3.22%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
36 days until earnings call
SPGYF
Price
$6.43
Change
-$0.02 (-0.31%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.81B
Ad is loading...

CLMT vs SPGYF

Header iconCLMT vs SPGYF Comparison
Open Charts CLMT vs SPGYFBanner chart's image
Calumet
Price$13.14
Change+$0.41 (+3.22%)
Volume$9.68K
Capitalization1.19B
Whitecap Resources
Price$6.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
Volume$95.89K
Capitalization4.81B
CLMT vs SPGYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLMT vs. SPGYF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMT is a Hold and SPGYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SPGYF: $6.43)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPGYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • SPGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPGYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SPGYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPGYF is a better buy in the short-term than CLMT.

Price Growth

SPGYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.87% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.13% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPGYF($4.81B) has a higher market cap than CLMT($1.19B). CLMT has higher P/E ratio than SPGYF: CLMT (25.19) vs SPGYF (5.96). SPGYF YTD gains are higher at: -9.309 vs. CLMT (-42.189). SPGYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. CLMT (418M). CLMT has more cash in the bank: 7.9M vs. SPGYF (0). SPGYF has less debt than CLMT: SPGYF (1.29B) vs CLMT (2B). SPGYF (4.19B) and CLMT (4.18B) have equivalent revenues.
CLMTSPGYFCLMT / SPGYF
Capitalization1.19B4.81B25%
EBITDA418M2.38B18%
Gain YTD-42.189-9.309453%
P/E Ratio25.195.96422%
Revenue4.18B4.19B100%
Total Cash7.9M0-
Total Debt2B1.29B155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLMT vs SPGYF: Fundamental Ratings
CLMT
SPGYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4340
SMR RATING
1..100
10056
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8675
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5352
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPGYF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMT (75) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SPGYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMT (43) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMT (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SPGYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMT (86) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMT (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLMTSPGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNGKY23.501.90
+8.77%
Hongkong Land Holdings Ltd.
BUDZ0.03N/A
+2.90%
WEED, Inc.
MTSFY27.140.31
+1.16%
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
LLKKF0.02N/A
N/A
Lake Resources N.L.
HEINY40.11-0.65
-1.59%
Heineken N.V.

CLMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMT and MEGEF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMT and MEGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLMT
1D Price
Change %
CLMT100%
+0.39%
MEGEF - CLMT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
HES - CLMT
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
IPOOF - CLMT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
NUVSF - CLMT
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
SPGYF - CLMT
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More

SPGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPGYF has been closely correlated with VRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPGYF jumps, then VRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPGYF
1D Price
Change %
SPGYF100%
-0.31%
VRN - SPGYF
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
BTE - SPGYF
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
ZPTAF - SPGYF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
OBE - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
VET - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More