It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOKYO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLNN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OKYO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLNN (@Biotechnology) experienced а -14.50% price change this week, while OKYO (@Biotechnology) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.
CLNN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.
OKYO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CLNN | OKYO | CLNN / OKYO | |
Capitalization | 33.3M | 35.5M | 94% |
EBITDA | -29.61M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -32.401 | -39.548 | 82% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 421K | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 14.6M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 22.9M | N/A | - |
CLNN | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLNN | OKYO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago48% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago80% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 11 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLNN and KZIA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLNN and KZIA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLNN | 100% | -1.96% | ||
KZIA - CLNN | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
GOSS - CLNN | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.58% | ||
QNCX - CLNN | 29% Poorly correlated | +13.04% | ||
VRNA - CLNN | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
VKTX - CLNN | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OKYO and MEIP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OKYO and MEIP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OKYO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OKYO | 100% | N/A | ||
MEIP - OKYO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
CLNN - OKYO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
AKBA - OKYO | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
URGN - OKYO | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
INZY - OKYO | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.58% | ||
More |