Ad is loading...
CLQZX vs GFAFX
CLQZX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFAFX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$10.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.20
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
CLQZX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. CLQZX (271M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CLQZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFAFX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. CLQZX (-5.37). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. CLQZX (34.07).
| CLQZX | GFAFX | CLQZX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.67 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.67 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.874 | -4.826 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 275B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.37 | 0.81 | -665% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.89 | 6.95 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.07 | 71.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.31 | 61.39 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...