CLRMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
10.13M
CMCXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.52M
Ad is loading...

CLRMF vs CMCXF

Header iconCLRMF vs CMCXF Comparison
Open Charts CLRMF vs CMCXFBanner chart's image
Clean Air Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$217.7K
Capitalization10.13M
CMC Metals
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.9K
Capitalization12.52M
CLRMF vs CMCXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRMF vs. CMCXF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRMF is a Hold and CMCXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRMF: $0.04 vs. CMCXF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CLRMF and CMCXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRMF: 82% vs. CMCXF: 49%
Market capitalization -- CLRMF: $10.13M vs. CMCXF: $12.52M
CLRMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.13M. CMCXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLRMF is a better buy in the long-term than CMCXF.

Price Growth

CLRMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while CMCXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.71% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCXF($12.5M) has a higher market cap than CLRMF($10.1M). CLRMF YTD gains are higher at: 2.661 vs. CMCXF (-21.290). CMCXF (-4.41M) and CLRMF (-4.48M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CLRMF has more cash in the bank: 9.95M vs. CMCXF (1.73M). CLRMF has less debt than CMCXF: CLRMF (21.2K) vs CMCXF (35.5K). CLRMF (0) and CMCXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CLRMFCMCXFCLRMF / CMCXF
Capitalization10.1M12.5M81%
EBITDA-4.48M-4.41M102%
Gain YTD2.661-21.290-12%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.95M1.73M574%
Total Debt21.2K35.5K60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCXF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVLU31.150.41
+1.33%
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
MOTI34.560.38
+1.10%
VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF
PBTP25.910.05
+0.19%
Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
GXUS46.58N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
WEIX26.11N/A
N/A
Dynamic Short Short-Term Volatility Futures ETF

CLRMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRMF and USGDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRMF and USGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRMF
1D Price
Change %
CLRMF100%
-3.55%
USGDF - CLRMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
TDRRF - CLRMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
ALKEF - CLRMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJIMF - CLRMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMCXF - CLRMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

CMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCXF and VLCJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCXF and VLCJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCXF
1D Price
Change %
CMCXF100%
-0.81%
VLCJF - CMCXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWAUF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
SAPLF - CMCXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
CLRMF - CMCXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
More