CLS vs IQM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and IQM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +9.88% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+3.84% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
CLS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ERH | 10.60 | 0.09 | +0.86% |
| Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | |||
| JGH | 11.88 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND | |||
| EPS | 55.43 | 0.08 | +0.14% |
| WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund | |||
| MMCA | 21.00 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| NYLI MacKay California Muni Intmdt ETF | |||
| SMH | 192.53 | -1.82 | -0.94% |
| VanEck Semiconductor ETF | |||
CLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | 100% | +4.32% | ||
| APH - CLS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| FLEX - CLS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| FN - CLS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| JBL - CLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SANM - CLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been closely correlated with MPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then MPWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| MPWR - IQM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| VRT - IQM | 78% Closely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| ANET - IQM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| CLS - IQM | 75% Closely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| GEV - IQM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||